708,446 research outputs found

    Gerrymandering and Compactness: Implementation Flexibility and Abuse

    Full text link
    The shape of an electoral district may suggest whether it was drawn with political motivations, or gerrymandered. For this reason, quantifying the shape of districts, in particular their compactness, is a key task in politics and civil rights. A growing body of literature suggests and analyzes compactness measures mathematically, but little consideration has been given to how these scores should be calculated in practice. Here, we consider the effects of a number of decisions that must be made in interpreting and implementing a set of popular compactness scores. We show that the choices made in quantifying compactness may themselves become political tools, with seemingly innocuous decisions leading to disparate scores. We show that when the full range of implementation flexibility is used, it can be abused to make clearly gerrymandered districts appear quantitatively reasonable. This complicates using compactness as a legislative or judicial standard to counteract unfair redistricting practices. This paper accompanies the release of packages in C++, Python, and R which correctly, efficiently, and reproducibly calculate a variety of compactness scores.Comment: 10 pages, 17 figures, 1 tabl

    On 2-adic orders of some binomial sums

    Get PDF
    We prove that for any nonnegative integers nn and rr the binomial sum k=nn(2nnk)k2r \sum_{k=-n}^n\binom{2n}{n-k}k^{2r} is divisible by 22nmin{α(n),α(r)}2^{2n-\min\{\alpha(n),\alpha(r)\}}, where α(n)\alpha(n) denotes the number of 1's in the binary expansion of nn. This confirms a recent conjecture of Guo and Zeng.Comment: 6 page

    Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences

    Get PDF
    An important property of any party system is the set of choices it presents to the electorate. In this paper we analyze the distribution of parties relative to voters in the multidimensional issue space and introduce two measures of the dispersion of the parties in the issue space relative to the voters, which we call measures of the compactness of the parties in the issue space. We show how compactness is easily computed using standard survey items found on national election surveys. Because we study the spacing of the parties relative to the distribution of the voters, we produce metric-free measures of compactness of the party system. The measures can be used to compare party systems across issues, over time within countries, and across countries. Comparing the compactness of party systems across countries allows us to determine the relative amount of issue choice afforded voters in different polities. We examine the compactness of the issue space and test the impact it has on voter choice in four countries: the United States, the Netherlands, Canada, and Great Britain. We demonstrate that the more compact the distribution of the parties in the issue space on any given issue, the less voters weight that issue in their vote decision. Thus we provide evidence supporting theories suggesting that the greater the choice offered by the parties in an election, the more likely it is that issue voting will play a major role in that election

    Is Investment in Agricultural Research a Good Substitute for Price Support in U.S. Cotton?

    Get PDF
    This article examines the effects of R&D on cotton yield and relationship between R&D and commodity support programs. The results indicate that yield elasticities with respect to cotton R&D is around 0.2-0.5 based on different regions. It further indicates that R&D increases government expenditures when both commodity programs and R&D funding exist. However, if the future WTO Doha negotiations rules out the possibility of price support programs, increasing R&D funding may provide one of the solutions for farmers to recover their income with 5-6 years lag.cotton, R&D, commodity support programs, Crop Production/Industries, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies,
    corecore